Sunday, December 20, 2009

Christian Author Willy Kipapa Accuses Most of the Protestant and all of the Baptist, and Roman Catholics of Teaching a False Doctrine from the Bible in their churches

Christian Author Willy Kipapa says a lot of of the Protestant and all of the Baptist and Roman Catholic clergy are teaching a apocryphal doctrine. The Bible is acceptable or acceptable (with out error) is a apocryphal doctrine.. He aswell says the gospels are contradicting anniversary other. Two are aggressive by God; two are aggressive by the devil.

-- Christian columnist Willy Kipapa says a lot of of the Protestant and all of the Baptist, and Roman Catholic clergy are accusable of teaching the apocryphal article the Bible is acceptable or acceptable in their churchs.

The majority of Protestant and all of the Baptist, and Roman Catholic churches accept this out anachronous and incorrect doctrine. The paid airy leaders in these churches accept to say they accept in this article or they'll get kicked out. These leaders are teaching a article that's not accurate by the Bible and they are clumsy to avert it.

Mr. Kipapa says his new book the Secret Gospel Codes and his website has cutting affirmation from the Bible that proves the Bible has errors. It aswell proves two books of the Bible has so abounding errors, lies, and bogus belief it looks like they were accounting by enemies of Christians.

Click actuality to see added evidence
www.true-christians.com

If anyone wants to use arguable columnist releases on the gospels and abbey scandals crop a attending at Mr. Kipapa’s RSS feeds. Mr.Kipapa asks that who anytime uses the advice let humans apperceive that they got the advice from him, and accord them his web abode so they can see what abroad he has. Mr. Kipapa says he will accumulate advancing up with new columnist releases so get absorbed up.

http://www.rsspad.com/rss2/8766.xml
Click actuality RSS

Mr. Kipapa gives addition archetype of how theologians are accepting deceitful. In Luke from David to Joseph there are 42 men or 42 ancestors. In Matthew from David to Joseph there are 27 men. Both Luke and Matthew are claiming these are Joseph's ancestors.

In Matthew David his son Solomon there is a band of ancestors traveling down to Joseph.
In Luke David his son Nathan there is a band of ancestors traveling down to Joseph.

Matthew affiliate one Joseph's dad is Jacob.
Luke affiliate two Joseph's dad is Heli.    

The advisers do not ambition to accept Luke and Matthew are contradicting anniversary other, because they accept to advise the apocryphal article the Bible is infallible. Theologians aces excuses out of attenuate air. In a lot of of the commentaries they say the ancestors in Luke are Mary's ancestors, but the accomplished affiliate of Luke doesn't even acknowledgment Mary's name.
    
They say in the Jewish nation women were like cheap citizens and they would not accept mentioned their name if they talked about their genealogy.

How do the advisers apperceive that Luke is talking about Mary's ancestors, and how do they apperceive that Matthew is not talking about Mary's ancestors? Luke is talking about Joseph's ancestors, because Joseph has 3 ancestors in Luke's band with his name. Luke is consistently cogent the truth. Matthew shows no ancestors with Joseph's name.

From David to Josiah there are 14 kings in Matthew's genealogy. The writers of the book of Matthew advisedly chose a band of kings.
Matthew's genealogy
David
Solomon
Roboam
Abia Asa
Josaphat
Joram
In amid Joram and Ozias
these 3 kings are missing.
Ahaziah    
Joash
Amaziah
Ozias
Joatham
Achaz        
Ezekias
Manasses
Amon
Josias had four sons, three of them were kings

Josiah’s oldest son is Jehoiakim was a King.
Jehoiakim’s son Jehoiachin was a king.
Here we accept addition error, Jehoiakim    
should be amid Josias and Jechonias.
according to 1Chronicles 3:15-17.

Jechonias is aswell alleged Jehoiachin, and Jeconiah. Scholars say the genealogies are just a asperous ashen archetype of the names. It was not meant to be an exact account. Maybe that is accurate from Adam-Moses, but that alibi cannot fly from David to the endure King of Judah. There were accurate annal of the Kings of Judah. What Matthew said is not true. In absoluteness abounding of the humans weren’t even complete in the band that Matthew chose.

According to 1Chronicles 3:15-17.

Mr. Kipapa says if the biographer of the book of Matthew leaves out 4 kings this would be accessible to the Jew's that the biographer of Matthew was not aggressive by God. It should aswell be accessible to anyone abroad who sees this error.

The majority of Christians do not apperceive these discrepancies are in the Bible. Most Christian leaders do not advise this in their church. This is one of those things that advisers alone allocution about if anyone asks. They assume to accept a action if humans don't ask, they won't tell. This is addition archetype of how the clergy is accepting deceitful. This apocryphal article is causing acceptable honest humans to be dishonest. The clergy should be abashed and they charge to apologize and ask for forgiveness.

###

No comments:

Post a Comment