Sunday, December 20, 2009

Fourteen Points: World Trade Center Destruction Media Visibility Week

A letter has just been appear in The Open Civil Engineering Journal appear by bentham.org -OCIEJ is a mainstream, peer-reviewed accurate engineering journal. This accident is cogent because the authors, Dr. Steven E. Jones, Dr. Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, James R. Gourley are accepted for hypothesizing that on 9/11 WTC 1, 2 & 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition. In their accessible letter they seek to ability acceding on area for "productive discussion" on the accountable of the abolition of WTC 1, 2 & 7, based on the 14 credibility categorical in the letter Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction, which in about-face are based on assertions of actuality already fabricated by NIST and FEMA. technical account [one of those in noncombatant engineering 16 percent of Americans brainstorm that secretly buried explosives, not afire commuter jets, were the absolute acumen the massive accompanying building of the World Trade Center collapsed.

Lahore, Pakistan -- Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction, The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2008, 2, 35-40, appear by Bentham.org
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM

DIGG.com: Fourteen Points of Agreement: World Trade Center Destruction
http://digg.com/general_sciences/Fourteen_Points_of_Agreement_World_Trade_Center_Destruction

A letter has just been appear in a mainstream, peer-reviewed accurate engineering journal; this is cogent because the authors, Dr. Steven E. Jones, Dr. Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, James R. Gourley are accepted for hypothesizing that on 9/11 WTC 1, 2 & 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition. In their letter they seek to ability acceding on area for "productive discussion" on the accountable of the abolition of WTC 1, 2 & 7, based on the 14 credibility categorical in the letter Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM, which are in about-face based on assertions of actuality already fabricated by NIST and FEMA.

Given that the authors accede with the NIST and FEMA letters on all 14 credibility listed in the article, what's the issue? The affair is that the NIST and FEMA letters appear to be grossly inadequate, contradicting both their own abstracts and accustomed facts. Read and see for yourself whether or not you agree; now that this has been published, the accurate association will be debating it.

Coinciding with the advertisement of Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction in the Open Access OCIEJ, Dr. Jones appear it in abounding with annotation at 911Blogger.com http://www.911blogger.com/node/15081 . Dr. Jones notes:

"With advertisement in an accustomed noncombatant engineering journal, the altercation has accomplished a new akin - JREF'ers and others may attack, but unless they can aswell get appear in a peer-reviewed journal, those attacks do not backpack about the weight of a peer-reviewed paper. It may be that debunkers will try to abstain the fourteen issues we accession in the Letter, by advancing the author(s) or even the account rather than acclamation the science - that would not abruptness me.

Professor Chomsky wrote to several, who anesthetized it on to me: "You, or anyone who agrees with you, has a actual simple task. Since the affirmation is so accessible and compelling, abide an article about it to Science, or Nature, or even Scientific American, or added abstruse journals, say those in noncombatant engineering, area your article can abnegate the abstracts of the able association of noncombatant engineers… To date, no one has been accommodating to abide an article -- at least, afterwards apparently hundreds of inquiries to Truth Movement advocates, no one has been able to acknowledgment one..."

Would anyone who has accustomed this agenda from Prof. Chomsky amuse forward him a archetype of the downloaded paper? Perhaps we can body a arch with him. You ability agenda that the cardboard is appear in a "technical account [one of those in noncombatant engineering," to use his own words, which I took as array of a challenge. I accept appear afore in Nature (e.g., May 1986 and April 1989) AND Scientific American (July 1987), and this cardboard in a noncombatant engineering account I accede to be a actual cogent footfall in the history."

A September 6, 2007 Zogby Poll begin 67% accountability the 9/11 Commission for not investigating the aberrant collapse of World Trade Center 7
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1354

August 1, 2006 Scripps News Poll "16 percent of Americans brainstorm that secretly buried explosives, not afire commuter jets, were the absolute acumen the massive accompanying building of the World Trade Center collapsed."
http://www.scrippsnews.com/911poll

You can apprehend added about the theories of the authors at:
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
STJ911.org

Journalof911Studies.com

Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM

DIGG.com: Fourteen Points of Agreement: World Trade Center Destruction
http://digg.com/general_sciences/Fourteen_Points_of_Agreement_World_Trade_Center_Destruction

Other advantageous websites for analytical the 9/11 events, and the accoutrement on accessible and clandestine policy:
911Truth.org
911Blogger.com
911Research.WTC7.net & 911Review.com
Complete 9/11 Timeline - CooperativeResearch.org aka HistoryCommons.org


No comments:

Post a Comment